appreciated my friend

Democracy is system (which by its meaning "rule of people") is not imperfect it is something not existing anywhere and we are all more or less oligarchies... For example, since now is summer - can't see how it is more good for all (and really all) that going to beach should be turned from something like breath of freedom with own thing to lay on, with own sandwitches and delicious donuts sold by locals, not very rich, into increasingly costly and restricitive episodes with almost forcing pople to buy from someone who never owned peace of earth.... and so this is cute example in right time. it is suitable, democracy, mostly for smaller communities where people are constantly asked about almost every decission, the bigger communites the less democratic, symplified said... Similar is travesty with word "republica" which in its base meant officials that are choosen in short, or temporar in any way, terms to do some job "for our cause/thing" and nobody ruled above others as some president etc. Of course that also went in some direction with growth, right after Servius

Just imagine ex-republics on the east with whole life rulers called "republics" in that sense

and so on and on, philosophy and words...
In short i like to talk about some direct things, like Palestine, views, should it be recognized instantly and so... but wasn't really important part of my post, just something noticeable. Portugal is great example on our continent... last foreign invader was almost Nabulione

(and it did take part in ww1 sending forces to Saloniki etc. but useless war) which is of course not their, Portugal's, weaker side it's its stronger side ), just we others have different histories and troubles... I hope Serb patriarch (de jure i.e. in papers equal to Pope in structures) should be also welcome and able to give big speeches and gatherings in Lisabon

It is funny and of course Portugal is our pal, one of 2 countries in Ineria that unconditionally support us and not to waste world about Portuguese girls opinion about us....
Let's finish this subject I intended and i take vaccation... It is from English Wiki page about "Peter Thomas (saint)" and bishop from Avignon time papacy which famously discussed with Dušan:
In 1354 he was made bishop of Patti and Lipari and In 1354-1358, Peter Thomas, promoted bishop of Patti and Lipari7, was sent to Serbia with the main objectives of putting an end to the vexatious measures against the Catholics of Serbia and evaluating the intentions of Stefan Dusan concerning his desire to unify the Orthodox Church of Serbia with the Roman Catholic Church. Dusan's goal was in fact to find political support in order to set out, under the cover of defense of the Catholic faith, to conquer Byzantium and its Empire. In view of the complex geopolitical situation and the lack of honesty of the ruler of Serbia, this mission of Peter Thomas did not succeed, in spite of his efforts.
In the spring of 1356, Thomas, with the Dominican Guglielmo Conti, bishop of Sizebolu, went to Venice and met with Louis I of Hungary to arrange a peace treaty between Venice and Hungary over Dalmatia, but despite his efforts, the negotiations became bogged down and no peace treaty was signed.

...must say initially wanted to write a bit longer elaborate with some details i find interesting, but changed my opinion and will change and shorten it max... Of course paragraph exclusively from Avignon sources and very funny on situation it described complex

There are other sources describing it and Pierre's activity, there is even complementary sources which describe it in story about Palman etc... we don't take any as apriori true but almost every is fun in own way so i started with laugh...
so shortening and change of subject - to really understand HIM Dušan and his "clash" with all 3 major churches for us - catholic, Constantine patriarchate and our own Serb orthodox (enough to say is that he is the only non-saint of all, undeservedly) there is something else in addition or in base... While he gifted and supported many churches - our, Italian, Greek, even mission to Holy Sepulture ; as i talked he was "in small hostility with them all", Avignon as well for reasons.... namely he was our first ruler to explicitely criticize church and figures, even in Code and had some views similar to initial Franciscans. "Worst of all" he explicitely wrote that church figures, including bishops, shoul be imediately "fired" in some cases... that was among his greater "sins" not discussions about (quasi and maybe false) relation with father, Venice, this or that conquest etc. while also important... Additionally, he shocked Eastern churches by allowing woman into Mount Athos etc ; (maybe first to do it) ...so maximally shortened to get some idea, while so many figures, from Pierre and Avignon to Constantinople patriarchate were "iritated" by him

as said simlified and shortened max, on very interesting and deep subject...
also - why i intentionally included last sentence in quote - Venice after all was "his ally" in days, only country which clashed with Angevines like him - but all with good and friendly intentions for all of us sisters ) ...vaccations, but always expeting youmy principessa (with big castle on Ligurian sea coast, where I move and be Servious)) ...sariously, subjects i like and many themes, always pick yours and let's see if we can help each other or exchange some interesting/fresh details...