ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
Moderator: REDrake
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
I have a question for the people that play the Weltkrieg campaign. Which of the two options do you like more?
Option A:
- Have an additional winter scenario against the Soviets at the end of 1944.
- Keep the proto choice before Operation Sealion 1945 at 5 different protos.
Or
Option B:
- Get rid of one of the protos at Sealion proto choice and dismiss the winter scenario against the Soviets.
- Add two scenarios at Shanghai and Seoul against Japan at the end of the campaign.
What would you choose?
Option A:
- Have an additional winter scenario against the Soviets at the end of 1944.
- Keep the proto choice before Operation Sealion 1945 at 5 different protos.
Or
Option B:
- Get rid of one of the protos at Sealion proto choice and dismiss the winter scenario against the Soviets.
- Add two scenarios at Shanghai and Seoul against Japan at the end of the campaign.
What would you choose?
Slava Ukraini! 

-
- Master Sergeant
- Posts: 983
- Joined: 2020-12-11 10:03, Friday
- Location: Corinth
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
B, more scenarios, more fun. 

Billions for Ukraine, who cares about Palestine? Israeli historian and author Ilan Pappe about genocide.....
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
To make it more difficult for you I prefer A.



Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
Actually it is easier because I don't have to change anything


Slava Ukraini! 

- Keighleyred
- First Lieutenant
- Posts: 228
- Joined: 2019-10-02 06:33, Wednesday
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]

option B for me

Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
Thanks everyone for sharing your opinion. Option B it is then
That's also what i prefer since I think it is more interesting.
And the maps are prettier

And the maps are prettier

Slava Ukraini! 

Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
Hi,thanks for good game. Im Ur Efile fans from china.I download installer from www.open-general.com, but the Efile is not new vision.I search long time,finally I get here. But I find that I cant use dropbox in mainland china. Would U please help me for any other way to download Ur Efile and maps?Thank U so much! And I cant download other maps in the game,I can down maps last year. Is that something happened?
Last edited by Bill Yan on 2025-07-12 09:26, Saturday, edited 2 times in total.
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
Hello, welcome to the fourmBill Yan wrote: ↑2025-07-12 09:13, Saturday Hi,thanks for good game. Im Ur Efile fans from china.I download installer from www.open-general.com, but the Efile is not new vision.I search long time,finally I get here. But I find that I cant use dropbox in mainland china. Would U please help me for any other way to download Ur Efile and maps?Thank U so much! And I cant download other maps in the game,I can down maps last year. Is that something happened?

Unfortunately the efile from the game installer must be very outdated. It was not possible to update the efile properly at the website, so the only thing I could do, was to upload at dropbox.
I don't know, is there any service I could upload the efile to, that you can use also in China?
Slava Ukraini! 

Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]

Maybe put the efile on Google Drive?
Although it's unclear what's blocked for China...
Game maps can be manually downloaded individually --> by entering the map number to download, e.g., 21
https://www.open-general.com/MapJpg/21.jpg
e.g., 12
https://www.open-general.com/MapJpg/12.jpg
The entire set of maps (1593 maps as of November 10, 2024) in a single .exe file --> weighing 1184914119 bytes --> can be downloaded from the Polish server.
Question: is such a large .exe file available for download for Bill Yan?
If the Google Drive experiment is successful, you could create a set (package) of maps for each campaign or for the entire e-file.
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
The new version of the efile and the final
version of Weltkrieg will be available next month and I can take a look into the future now.
I am thinking about deleting my old campaigns because they don't live up to the standard that Weltkrieg set. I will never play my old campaigns again and I don't want to maintain them. In my opinion a designer should play campaigns once a year to check for bugs and I don't want to do that for the old campaigns. Of course I am not planning to delete campaigns from other designers or collaborative campaigns although the same issues apply here as well (like Major Heinz has not played his campaign ever since he released it in 2020!).
So there's Weltkrieg, my new benchmark when it comes do designing campaigns, and then there's the rest.
Btw, does anybody like the name Weltkrieg?
When looking for a name for the campaign I thought everybody knews what Blitzkrieg means and Weltkrieg means World War, so I thought it would be a fitting name but it does not sound cool
Should I change it?
Here are my future plans:
- relese new version of the efile in July 2025
- release new and hopefully final version of Weltkrieg.
- ATOMIC BLITZKIREG will be renamed BLITZKRIEG PLUS. I will reserve the ATOMIC label for campaigns that reach the same standard as Weltkrieg. I hope there is no such campaign as Blitzkrieg Plus for an other efile
- My next campaign will be ATOMIC BARBAROSSA. I always enjoyed the scenarios against the Soviets in 1941 and 1942 the most. The core is not yet too big and too powerful and you have a nice development of new units. So BARBAROSSA will be a extract of these scenarios from the Weltkrieg campaign. There will also be a new scenario on the unused Perekop map and two new scenarios on the Vyazma and Rostov maps.
And since I have still two map numbers booked I plan to add one new map and scenario the campaign. At the moment I am leaning towards Brest (Brest-Litovsk) because Brest was attacked on the first day of Barbarossa and this would give us a new starting point for the campaign.
- Next year I plan do build a ATOMIC GRAND ALLIED CAMPAIGN, a campaign similar to Weltkrieg for the western allies. The campaign will continue in 1945 with Operation Unthinkable against the Soviets. One new map should be Mareth, Tunisia. (And maybe I will finish my Ruhr Area map which I started years ago and which is roughly 50% finished but untouched for 2 or 3 years.)

I am thinking about deleting my old campaigns because they don't live up to the standard that Weltkrieg set. I will never play my old campaigns again and I don't want to maintain them. In my opinion a designer should play campaigns once a year to check for bugs and I don't want to do that for the old campaigns. Of course I am not planning to delete campaigns from other designers or collaborative campaigns although the same issues apply here as well (like Major Heinz has not played his campaign ever since he released it in 2020!).
So there's Weltkrieg, my new benchmark when it comes do designing campaigns, and then there's the rest.
Btw, does anybody like the name Weltkrieg?


Here are my future plans:
- relese new version of the efile in July 2025
- release new and hopefully final version of Weltkrieg.
- ATOMIC BLITZKIREG will be renamed BLITZKRIEG PLUS. I will reserve the ATOMIC label for campaigns that reach the same standard as Weltkrieg. I hope there is no such campaign as Blitzkrieg Plus for an other efile

- My next campaign will be ATOMIC BARBAROSSA. I always enjoyed the scenarios against the Soviets in 1941 and 1942 the most. The core is not yet too big and too powerful and you have a nice development of new units. So BARBAROSSA will be a extract of these scenarios from the Weltkrieg campaign. There will also be a new scenario on the unused Perekop map and two new scenarios on the Vyazma and Rostov maps.
And since I have still two map numbers booked I plan to add one new map and scenario the campaign. At the moment I am leaning towards Brest (Brest-Litovsk) because Brest was attacked on the first day of Barbarossa and this would give us a new starting point for the campaign.
- Next year I plan do build a ATOMIC GRAND ALLIED CAMPAIGN, a campaign similar to Weltkrieg for the western allies. The campaign will continue in 1945 with Operation Unthinkable against the Soviets. One new map should be Mareth, Tunisia. (And maybe I will finish my Ruhr Area map which I started years ago and which is roughly 50% finished but untouched for 2 or 3 years.)
Slava Ukraini! 

Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]




Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]

You brought your toys to the sandbox --> you let others play --> now you want to take them away?I'm thinking about deleting my old campaigns because they don't live up to the standard that Weltkrieg set. I will never play my old campaigns again and I don't want to maintain them.
I'll tell my story on this forum (JPs)
A long time ago --> I made a new drawing for map 12 (map 1201) --> there was a story that we were getting rid of SSI elements (the icons were replaced based on this).
The community didn't like this drawing (brightness, colors...). A little later, I made map 1267 and wanted to remove 1201 - and publish a new, larger map (1267) under the number 1201. All these maps are named Ciechanow.
I was told --> no --> We're giving you a new number (1267).
We currently have three Ciechanow maps --> 12 (SSI), 1201 (a map based on 12 - changed graphics, no terrain changes), 1267 (a new, large map based on wartime maps).
What if the author is dead?In my opinion, a designer should play campaigns once a year to check for bugs, and I don't want to do that. That's for the old campaigns.
What if they're absent?
What if the author has made 70 campaigns? --> how many campaigns do you think the author should make --> to test them --> every year?
In a normal community, players should play campaigns and report if something is wrong.
-
- Master Sergeant
- Posts: 983
- Joined: 2020-12-11 10:03, Friday
- Location: Corinth
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
ΙΜΗΟ, leave all the old campaigns as it is. Is part of history, we can't delete history. Imagine if in 3 years (and i am still alive) i like to play your Italian campaign, just to remember something..... Leave the old campaigns as it is, with all the respect i have for you




Billions for Ukraine, who cares about Palestine? Israeli historian and author Ilan Pappe about genocide.....
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
I'm a bad example... I haven't played a single full campaign --> from any efile.
On the Polish version of the game, I've played about a dozen campaigns out of 170 available.
I simply can't play well.
On the Polish version of the game, I've played about a dozen campaigns out of 170 available.
I simply can't play well.
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
Okay, okay, I surrenderDimitris GR wrote: ↑2025-07-15 19:12, Tuesday ΙΜΗΟ, leave all the old campaigns as it is. Is part of history, we can't delete history. Imagine if in 3 years (and i am still alive) i like to play your Italian campaign, just to remember something..... Leave the old campaigns as it is, with all the respect i have for you![]()
![]()
![]()

If you play more you will get better. 'Learning by doing' as the saying goes

Slava Ukraini! 

Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]


You'll find the link to the newest version (1st August 2025) in the first post of this thread!
Most notable the Weltkrieg campaign has been finalized and you now can play the biggest Open General campaign ever with 85 scenarios on big maps!
There are also few new units and icons in the efile as well as some minor tweaks.
Slava Ukraini! 

Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
Looks like I'm getting a crash as soon as I purchase units with a transport attached.
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
Hmm that is strange


Slava Ukraini! 

Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
im on version 25.02.26.0 right now
downloaded the new efile, deleted what was in there and moved the new one over
im able to purchase units but as soon as i buy one with a transport and move to a different tab it crashes
downloaded the new efile, deleted what was in there and moved the new one over
im able to purchase units but as soon as i buy one with a transport and move to a different tab it crashes
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
it does it with other efiles also so im thinking its something wrong with the base game
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
I can confirm there is indeed a bug crashing the game at the purchase screen. When I go back to version 25.02.01.0 from 1st February of the game the bug is gone. So it must be indeed a bug in the latest version from 26th February. I giess I was playing with the slightly older version but I don't remember the changes that were made in february.
But you can try this workaround. Buy the unit(s) with transport from one class. Then exit the purchase screen and get back to the overview of your core army. Then buy units with transport from an other class. This way the game does not crash.
But you can try this workaround. Buy the unit(s) with transport from one class. Then exit the purchase screen and get back to the overview of your core army. Then buy units with transport from an other class. This way the game does not crash.
Slava Ukraini! 

Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
Hey that work around works!
Should we make a separate thread about the bug?
Should we make a separate thread about the bug?
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]

Luis is aware of this bug.
I reported it (recorded a video and described it), then reminded him...
The last response was this:
viewtopic.php?p=20687#p20687No problem my friend, the crash happens because an attachment is checked against a badly set up unit (has no equipment assigned) which is due to some initialization not properly done when updating one of the several list used at that time (units bought, units shown to pick, list of transports, list of containers, ...)
Jaro sent me a bug-tracker-mail attaching all material needed to debug the issue, and I just need a relaxed time to check thoroughly every step to see were the error is done. But I am on the way, so I hope to catch it soon.
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
Thanks for the reminder


I knew I read about this bug before somewhere but couldn't exactly rememeber.
At least there is a workaround for now. Close purchase screen after every purchase and then open it again for the next purchase.
Slava Ukraini! 

Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]

Since we came to the same conclusions, it must be true.
viewtopic.php?p=20222#p20222Second thing
The last game engine from February 26, 2025 (only this one --> I checked it on several previous engines) exits to windows, without any warning in the following situation
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ThRDUx ... sp=sharing
....
Supplement
When after buying units from only two different classes --> I go to the command center --> then I renew further purchase from the third class --> then I go to the command center again (or e.g. I put previously purchased units into the game) --> I can continue buying --> without a glitch
The order of unit classes does not matter
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
I put together a draft of the campaign path of the Barbarossa campaign. Most scenarios will be pulled from the Weltkrieg campaign. There will be a handful of new scenarios and two new maps. Brest will be a new map and then I will simply take that map and add some land to the northeast for a follow-up scenario and map. So basically there will be two maps that share some of the same area.
Starting with two new scenarios gives the player the chance to build a core and the bigger the core the less I have to change the existing scenarios.
All new scenarios will take place in 1941 though, because maps are missing for 1942 and 1943. But it is what it is
A long time ago I made maps for the Finish-Russian border region around Salla and Alakurtti and I am thinking to expand them into a 3K map. That would be easy because I simply would have to add some arctic terrain to the north and south of the map(s) and since there are basically no roads and cities, it would be very easy. It would be another 1941 scenario though. I will decide about this later.
Starting with two new scenarios gives the player the chance to build a core and the bigger the core the less I have to change the existing scenarios.
All new scenarios will take place in 1941 though, because maps are missing for 1942 and 1943. But it is what it is

A long time ago I made maps for the Finish-Russian border region around Salla and Alakurtti and I am thinking to expand them into a 3K map. That would be easy because I simply would have to add some arctic terrain to the north and south of the map(s) and since there are basically no roads and cities, it would be very easy. It would be another 1941 scenario though. I will decide about this later.
Code: Select all
1941 - 17 scenarios
1942 - 9 scenarios
1943 - 8 scenarios
NEW Barbarossa I (Brest) Jun 22, 1941 NEW
NEW Barbarossa II Jun 23, 1941 NEW
Operation München Jul 2, 1941 1555.png
Battle of Narva Jul 20, 1941 1556.png
Siege of Odessa Aug 5, 1941 1498.png
Nikolaev Pocket Aug 11, 1941 1571.png
Battle of Novgorod '41 Aug 14, 1941 1548.png
Invasion of Karelia Aug 18, 1941 1540.png
Dniepr Bridgehead Sep 7, 1941 1557.png
Battle of Dnipropetrovsk Sep 24, 1941 1588.png
Melitopol Counterattack Sep 27, 1941 1507.png
NEW Perekop Breakthrough Sep 29, 1941 1563.png
NEW Vyazma Pocket Oct 6, 1941 1593.png
Battle of the Sea of Azov Oct 8, 1941 1532.png
Battle of Taganrog Oct 15, 1941 1533.png
NEW Battle of Rostov I Nov 10, 1941 1589.png
Battle of Rostov II Nov 27, 1941 1075.png
Operation Trappenjagd May 8, 1942 1292.png
Siege of Sevastopol Jun 6, 1942 1561.png
Case Blue Jul 21, 1942 1589.png
Battle of Stalingrad I Jul 28, 1942 1562.png
Battle of Stalingrad II Aug 2, 1942 1559.png
Operation Blücher Aug 4, 1942 1448.png
Operation Edelweiss Aug 10, 1942 1564.png
Battle of Baku Sep 18, 1942 1462.png
Operation Uranus Nov 20, 1942 1534.png
Battle of Stalingrad III Jan 6, 1943 1562.png
Steppe Blitz Jul 14, 1943 1529.png
Battle of the White Sea Aug 20, 1943 1064.png
Battle of Arkhangelsk Aug 27, 1943 1065.png
Battle of Novgorod '43 Oct 1, 1943 1548.png
Vyazma Airborne Operation Nov 18, 1943 1593.png
Siege of Leningrad Dec 12, 1943 935.png
Siege of Moscow Mar 27, 1944 1590.png
Slava Ukraini! 

-
- Master Sergeant
- Posts: 983
- Joined: 2020-12-11 10:03, Friday
- Location: Corinth
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]



You plan to add triggers?
Billions for Ukraine, who cares about Palestine? Israeli historian and author Ilan Pappe about genocide.....
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
Yes, there will also be triggers. It will basically be a campaign with Weltkrieg rules and settings.
If it is possible to start a campaign with a choice scenario I also want to have three different starting core armies. One infantry division, one tank division and for air marshall hoza

I will have to see how much prestige the infantry divison costs and then create the other two core armys. The infantry division will be the biggest army, because the units are cheaper, but all armies will have the same overall prestige value.
But I have to check if it is possible to start the campaign with a choice screen.
Slava Ukraini! 

-
- Master Sergeant
- Posts: 983
- Joined: 2020-12-11 10:03, Friday
- Location: Corinth
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]

Hoza, the master of the sky

Billions for Ukraine, who cares about Palestine? Israeli historian and author Ilan Pappe about genocide.....
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
and still very busy with Weltkrieg


Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
The new campaign would not be finished anytime soon anyway. So there is enough time to play Weltkrieg

Slava Ukraini! 

Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
I am thinking about the upcomming campaign every day and every day I have new ideas. I now think I should make a Eastern Front campaign that starts in 1939 instead of Barbarossa a campaign that starts in 1941.
Instead of making two maps of the Brest area I could make one of Brest and one of Warsaw and then add 5 scenarios in 1939 to the campaign.
The Brest map could be used twice (and both new maps Brest and Warsaw, could also be used in 1944 in a potential Soviet campaign).
Starting in Poland 1939 gives me also the chance to finally use the Bydgoszcz map, which so far I did not use.
The campaign path would look like this, with 5 scenarios added and one scenario (second Brest 1941) deleted:
Instead of making two maps of the Brest area I could make one of Brest and one of Warsaw and then add 5 scenarios in 1939 to the campaign.
The Brest map could be used twice (and both new maps Brest and Warsaw, could also be used in 1944 in a potential Soviet campaign).
Starting in Poland 1939 gives me also the chance to finally use the Bydgoszcz map, which so far I did not use.
The campaign path would look like this, with 5 scenarios added and one scenario (second Brest 1941) deleted:
Code: Select all
Battle of Westerplatte Sep 1, 1939 1341.png
NEW Battle of the Vistula Sep 4, 1939 1585.png
Battle of Hel Sep 8, 1939 1560.png
NEW Battle of Warsaw Sep 10, 1939 NEW
NEW Battle of Brest Sep 13, 1939 NEW
NEW Operation Barbarossa (Brest) Jun 22, 1941 NEW
Operation München Jul 2, 1941 1555.png
Battle of Narva Jul 20, 1941 1556.png
Siege of Odessa Aug 5, 1941 1498.png
Nikolaev Pocket Aug 11, 1941 1571.png
Battle of Novgorod '41 Aug 14, 1941 1548.png
Invasion of Karelia Aug 18, 1941 1540.png
Dniepr Bridgehead Sep 7, 1941 1557.png
Battle of Dnipropetrovsk Sep 24, 1941 1588.png
Melitopol Counterattack Sep 27, 1941 1507.png
NEW Perekop Breakthrough Sep 29, 1941 1563.png
NEW Vyazma Pocket Oct 6, 1941 1593.png
Battle of the Sea of Azov Oct 8, 1941 1532.png
Battle of Taganrog Oct 15, 1941 1533.png
NEW Battle of Rostov I Nov 10, 1941 1589.png
Battle of Rostov II Nov 27, 1941 1075.png
Operation Trappenjagd May 8, 1942 1292.png
Siege of Sevastopol Jun 6, 1942 1561.png
Case Blue Jul 21, 1942 1589.png
Battle of Stalingrad I Jul 28, 1942 1562.png
Battle of Stalingrad II Aug 2, 1942 1559.png
Operation Blücher Aug 4, 1942 1448.png
Operation Edelweiss Aug 10, 1942 1564.png
Battle of Baku Sep 18, 1942 1462.png
Operation Uranus Nov 20, 1942 1534.png
Battle of Stalingrad III Jan 6, 1943 1562.png
Steppe Blitz Jul 14, 1943 1529.png
Battle of the White Sea Aug 20, 1943 1064.png
Battle of Arkhangelsk Aug 27, 1943 1065.png
Battle of Novgorod '43 Oct 1, 1943 1548.png
Vyazma Airborne Operation Nov 18, 1943 1593.png
Siege of Leningrad Dec 12, 1943 935.png
Siege of Moscow Mar 27, 1944 1590.png
1939 - 5
1941 - 16
1942 - 9
1943 - 8
Slava Ukraini! 

-
- Master Sergeant
- Posts: 983
- Joined: 2020-12-11 10:03, Friday
- Location: Corinth
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]



Billions for Ukraine, who cares about Palestine? Israeli historian and author Ilan Pappe about genocide.....
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
good idea. I like the early war equipment. 

Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
Me too! Developing the core between 1939 and the end of 1941 is really the most interesting phase of the game for me.
Maybe Warsaw could be even two scenarios - the map is big and the core is still small. But that I have to decide when time has come.
Slava Ukraini! 

-
- Master Sergeant
- Posts: 983
- Joined: 2020-12-11 10:03, Friday
- Location: Corinth
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
Yes, i believe 2 scenarios will be great in a big map.
Billions for Ukraine, who cares about Palestine? Israeli historian and author Ilan Pappe about genocide.....
Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
I agree, that would be good. Then one more scenario later and we have 40 scenarios.
40 is a good number for such a campaign and I will be happy

Slava Ukraini! 

Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]

Battle of Brest Sep 13, 1939
Operation Barbarossa (Brest) Jun 22, 1941 NEW
After two weeks of battle in September, will you send the army home for 20 months? --> they'll lose all their experience and become lazy.
With an army like that, will you challenge the Soviets?
You make a map for Warsaw, and I'll make one for Bonn --> nice swap.

Re: ATOMIC Efile [see 1st post]
Hehe yes

The units will spend their time at a quiet part of the front I guess

Do you have any suggestions?
Slava Ukraini! 
